The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand
Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual property | The Guardian
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat
Welcome
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer
CURIA - Documentos
Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv
Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat
The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion Industry
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Adidas Successful in Three-stripe Opposition Case
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel stripes placed on the side of sports shoes
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat
The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Adidas v Shoe Branding—Why Adidas's Three-stripe Mark Means More than Stripes – Infusion Lawyers
